Table Of Content
- You May Also Like
- External Links
The efficiency of solar panels is quantified by the ratio of incoming solar radiation (irradiance) to the quantity of energy produced. The average panel's conversion efficiency has risen from 15% to well over 20% as a result of recent developments in solar technology. Since this efficiency boost was so significant, the power output of a typical-sized panel went from 250 W to 400 W.
The efficiency of solar panels is governed by two primary factors: the efficiency of individual photovoltaic (PV) cells, which depends on cell design and silicon type, and the overall efficiency of the panel, which depends on the cell layout, configuration, and panel size. These days, the most powerful solar panels may achieve power ratings of up to 700 watts, and increasing the panel size can boost efficiency by allowing a bigger surface area to catch sunlight.
The efficiency of a cell depends on its structure and the substrate utilized, which is typically either P-type or N-type silicon. The fill factor (FF) is the greatest conversion efficiency of a PV cell at the optimal operating voltage and current, and it is used as a measure of cell efficiency.
In order to maximize panel efficiency, much consideration must be given to the design of the cells themselves. The silicon type, busbar arrangement, junction, and passivation type are all key characteristics (PERC). Panels manufactured with high-cost IBC cells are now the most efficient (20–22%) because of their high-purity N-type silicon substrate and minimal losses from busbar shading. However, efficiency values of considerably over 21% have been attained by panels created using the most recent monocrystalline PERC cells, N-Type TOPcon, and cutting-edge heterojunction (HJT) cells. The commercialization of ultra-high efficiency Tandem Perovskite cells is expected within the next few years, despite the fact that their development is still in its early stages.
Standard test conditions (STC) are used to evaluate solar panel performance; these circumstances include a cell temperature of 25 °C, a solar irradiation of 1000 W/m2, and an air mass of 1.5. Taking the highest power rating, or Pmax (W) at STC, and dividing it by the entire panel size, in m2, yields the efficiency (%) of the panel.
Many parameters, such as temperature, irradiance, cell type, and cell connections, may affect the overall efficiency of a panel. Surprisingly, even the protective backsheet's color might have an impact on performance. The visual appeal of a black backsheet is outweighed by the fact that it causes the cell temperature to rise, which in turn raises the resistance and somewhat decreases the overall conversion efficiency.
The efficiency of solar panels may be affected by factors such as the cells used, how they are configured, and the type of solar energy they produce.
The most efficient solar panels are those made using cutting-edge "interdigitated back contact" (IBC) cells, followed by those made with heterojunction (HJT) cells, TOPcon cells, half-cut and multi-busbar monocrystalline PERC cells, shingled cells, and lastly 60-cell (4-5 busbar) mono cells. The least efficient and most affordable panels are the polycrystalline or multicrystalline 60-cell varieties.
Top 10 Solar Panels with the Highest Efficiency
High-performance N-type heterojunction (HJT) cells have been the basis for a proliferation of new, more efficient solar panel designs during the last two years. The top six panels' efficiency has now risen beyond 22%. Newer panels from Canadian Solar, Panasonic, and REC all have N-type HJT cells and are closing the gap on the market-leading SunPower Maxeon panels. Next-generation panels employing multi-busbar (MBB) half-cut N-type TOPCon cells from Jinko Solar, Trina Solar, and JA Solar have helped raise panel efficiency far over 21%, while high-performance panels from SPIC and Meyer Burger using IBC cells have also helped narrow the gap.
Light-induced degradation (LID) may be as low as 0.25 percent of power loss per year in panels using N-type cells, making them more efficient overall. Many of these high-efficiency panels are guaranteed to still produce 90% or more of the original rated capacity when the 25-year life of the panel is included.
Why efficiency matters
There is a lot of hype around the phrase "efficiency," but a somewhat more efficient panel is not always a higher-quality panel. While efficiency is certainly a factor, real-world performance, dependability, manufacturer service, and warranty conditions are what really count when making a solar panel purchase decision.
Generally speaking, the shorter the time it takes for the embodied energy (the energy needed to extract the raw materials and make the solar panel) to be paid back by the energy produced by the solar panel, the better for the environment. In most cases, a two-year payback period for the embodied energy is already achieved by silicon-based solar panels in full lifecycle analyses. Although the payback period used to be more than 1.5 years, it has decreased to less than a year as panel efficiency has grown over the 20% mark. A solar system with higher efficiency will create more power during the 20+ year lifespan of a solar panel and will pay off the initial investment faster.
Many high-efficiency solar panels employ better-quality N-type silicon cells, which have a lower temperature coefficient and greater resistance to power loss over time; hence, efficiency is a good indicator of performance. In fact, after 25 years of usage, certain manufacturers, including REC, Panasonic, and SunPower, guarantee a 90% or greater residual power output.
Area vs. efficiency
Saving energy may significantly reduce the square footage of a home's roof. There is a direct correlation between panel efficiency and energy output; the more efficient the panels, the less surface area is needed to create the same amount of energy. This works well for roofs that are short in square footage, and it also makes it possible to install systems of greater capacity on any roof. For instance, the total solar capacity provided by a set of 12 x 400W high efficiency solar panels, such as those manufactured by LG or SunPower, with a 21.8% conversion efficiency would be approximately 1200W (1.2 kW) higher than that provided by a set of 12 x 300W solar panels with a lower 17.5% efficiency.
- At 17.5% efficiency, 12 x 300W panels equal 3,600 W.
- 12 x 400W panels at 21.8 percent efficiency = 4,800 W
The efficiency with which solar panels function under real-world conditions is affected by a wide range of contextual variables. These variables might have a negative impact on panel efficiency and system performance, depending on the local environmental conditions. The following are the most influential aspects that determine solar panel performance:
- Irradiance (W/m2)
- Layout in Panels
- Location (latitude)
- Time of the year
- Dust and dirt
In actual usage, irradiance, shading, orientation, and temperature have the greatest influence on panel efficiency.
Atmospheric circumstances, including clouds and pollution, latitude, and time of year, all affect the amount of solar irradiance, which is expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2). Obviously, a panel's power output will be quite low if it is completely shadowed, but even partial shading may have a significant effect on both the efficiency of the panel and the efficiency of the system as a whole. Since most panels are linked in series, shading one panel has an effect on the whole string. Even partial shading across many cells on a single panel may lower power output by as much as 50%. This is why it's crucial to take measures to lessen or get rid of the shadows whenever feasible. The good news is that as add-on devices, optimisers and micro-inverters are available to mitigate the drawbacks of shading, particularly when only a few panels are affected.
Efficiency vs. Temperature
Standard Test Conditions (STC) at 25 °C cell temperature and 1000 W/m2 irradiance are used to determine a solar panel's power rating, expressed in Watts (W). In practical applications, however, the temperature of the cell often increases over 25 degrees Celsius, depending on factors such as the surrounding air temperature, wind speed, time of day, and solar irradiance (W/m2). Depending on the solar cell and its temperature coefficient, the increase in internal cell temperature of 20°C to 30°C during sunny weather might result in a loss in power production of 8–15%. Most producers will also provide the power rating under NOCT settings, also known as the nominal operating cell temperature, to give you a realistic idea of how well your solar panels would perform in normal use. In order to more closely reflect the normal real-world working circumstances of a solar panel, NOCT performance is often defined at a lower solar irradiation level of 800 W/m2 and a cell temperature of 45 °C.
As the PV cell voltage rises at temperatures below STC (25 °C), excessively cold temperatures may improve power output above the nameplate limit. In extreme cold, solar panels may produce more electricity than their maximum allowable output (Pmax) for brief periods of time. This is typical when the clouds finally part and the sun shines through.
The Power Temperature Coefficient
Every degree above or below STC for a given cell will either decrease or increase the power output by a fixed amount. This is expressed as a percentage change for every degree Celsius change in temperature and is known as the power temperature coefficient. The average temperature coefficient for monocrystalline panels is -0.38%/°C, whereas the average for polycrystalline panels is -0.40%/°C. While HJT (heterojunction) cells function best at high temperatures, monocrystalline IBC cells have a temperature coefficient of roughly -0.30%/°C, which is much lower.
Temperature coefficient comparison
When it comes to efficiency, lower values for the power temperature coefficient per degree Celsius are preferred.
- Polycrystalline cells - 0.39 to 0.43 % /°C
- Monocrystalline cells - 0.35 to 0.40 % /°C
- Monocrystalline IBC cells - 0.28 to 0.31 % /°C
- Monocrystalline HJT cells - 0.25 to 0.27 % /°C
The following graph compares the efficiency of many distinct PV cell types used in solar panels, highlighting the resulting power loss. A lot less power is lost at higher temperatures in N-type heterojunction (HJT) and IBC cells than in typical polycrystalline and monocrystalline PERC cells.
Graphing the performance of different solar cell types as a function of temperature: It's important to keep in mind that the temperature inside the cell (the panel) is normally 20 to 30 degrees Celsius higher than that of the surrounding air.
Notes on the Power vs. Temperature chart:
- STC stands for Standard Test Conditions.- 25 °C (77 °F)
- NOCT = Nominal operating cell temperature, 45 °C (113 °F).
- (^) High cell temperature = Typical summer cell temperature of 65 °C (149 °F).
- (#) Maximum operating temperature = Maximum panel operating temperature during extremely high temperatures mounted on a dark-colored rooftop: 85 °C (185 °F).
The typical 5-8% drop in power production at NOCT is attributed to the fact that the cell temperature is 20°C higher than the surrounding air temperature. However, when installed on a dark-colored rooftop during very hot, 45°C, windless days, the cell temperature may increase as high as 85°C, which is typically regarded as the maximum operational temperature of a solar panel.
Most Efficient Solar Cells
The most efficient solar panels on the market often employ either N-type (IBC) monocrystalline silicon cells or the other extremely efficient N-type variant, heterojunction (HJT) cells. However, certain high-volume producers, like JinkoSolar, Longi Solar, and Trina Solar, are beginning to switch to the more efficient N-type cells, while most other manufacturers continue to utilize the more prevalent P-type mono-PERC cells.
The efficiency of different solar PV cell types
- Polycrystalline: 15 to 18%
- Monocrystalline: 16.5 to 19%
- Polycrystalline PERC: 17–19.5%
- Monocrystalline PERC: 17.5 to 20%
- Monocrystalline N-type: 19 to 20.5%
- Monocrystalline N-type HJT: 19 to 21.7%
- Monocrystalline N-type IBC: 20 to 22.8%
Cost vs. efficiency
Every manufacturer has a selection of panels with varying efficiency ratings, determined by the type of silicon used and whether or not the panels use PERC, multi-busbar, or other cell technologies. Panels with efficiencies exceeding 21% and N-type cells tend to be rather pricey, so they're best reserved for situations where space is at a premium; otherwise, you may spend more for the same amount of electricity that might be generated with just one or two more panels. However, high-efficiency panels utilizing N-type cells will nearly always outperform and outlive panels using P-type cells because of the lower rate of light-induced deterioration, or LID, and therefore the additional expense is typically worth it in the long run.
Comparatively, a standard 370W panel will normally cost about $185, whereas a high-efficiency 400W+ panel might cost as much as $350. This corresponds to around $0.50 per watt compared to $0.90 per watt. If you're looking to invest in a solar panel, keep in mind that the more costly panels from industry leaders like Sunpower, Panasonic, and REC often provide superior performance with slower degradation rates and longer manufacturer or product warranties.
Panel Size vs. Efficiency
As the efficiency of a panel is determined by its power rating divided by its overall area, having a bigger panel is not always indicative of a more efficient panel. Cell surface area does grow with panel size; therefore, employing bigger cells does improve efficiency.
While larger 72-cell panels are used in commercial systems, 6-inch (156mm) square 60-cell panels are still widely used in residential applications. In 2020, however, a new industry trend arose toward considerably bigger panel sizes constructed around new, larger-sized cells, which raised panel efficiency and boosted power output up to an astonishing 600W.
Common solar panel sizes
- 60 cell panel (120 HC): approx. width 0.98 m, length 1.65 m
- 72 cell panel (144 HC): approx. width 1.0 m, length 2.0 m
- 96/104 cell panel: approximately 1.05 m by 1.60 m
- 66 cell panel (132 HC): approx. width 1.10 m x length 1.80 m
- 78 cell panel (156 HC): approx. width 1.30m x length 2.4m
- HC stands for half-cut cells.
A common size 60-cell (1 m x 1.65 m) panel with 18–20% efficiency generally has a power rating of 300–330 watts; however, a panel with higher-efficiency cells of the same size may generate up to 370 watts.As previously indicated, the most efficient standard-size panels feature high-performance N-type IBC, or interdigitated back contact cells, which may reach up to 22.8% panel efficiency and output an astonishing 390 to 440 watts.
Popular half-cut or split cell modules have twice the number of cells while maintaining nearly the same panel size.When using the half-cell format, the number of cells in a panel increases by a factor of 2. Since the panel voltage is maintained but the current is divided, the efficiency of the half-cut cell design improves marginally. The current flowing through half-cut panels is reduced, resulting in less resistive losses and a lower temperature coefficient.
New, larger cells and high-power 600W+ panels
Solar panel producers have abandoned the conventional 156mm (6") square cell wafer size in favor of bigger wafer sizes in an effort to reduce production costs, enhance efficiency, and boost output. Cell sizes range from 166mm to 210mm, with the latter two being the most common. Manufacturing companies have developed highly efficient solar panels with ratings of up to 700W thanks to the combination of bigger cells and new, larger panel shapes. Panel efficiency may be increased to above 22% when using modern cell technologies like multi-busbar (MBB), TOPcon, and tiling ribbon in conjunction with larger cell sizes, which have a higher surface area.
Currently, the most efficient solar panels available on the market are roughly 23 percent efficient. SunPower's high-efficiency solar panels, with an efficiency rating of 22.8%, are widely acknowledged as the most efficient solar panels currently on the market. Two more companies that produce high-quality solar panels are LG (22%) and REC Solar (5%). (21.7 percent)
Because of the high initial cost, many homeowners hesitate before installing solar panels. According to the Center for Sustainable Energy, the average installation cost ranges between $15,000 and $25,000When it comes to solar panel installations, polycrystalline panels are often the most cost-effective option; however, this varies depending on the specific panels being installed and the number of panels required.
Which are the most efficient solar panels?
Solar panels made from monocrystalline silicon are the most efficient currently available. This is due to the fact that each cell is made from a solitary silicon wafer in the manufacturing process. Unfortunately, its high cost belies its high efficiency in turning sunlight into power.
Could we eventually have solar panels with an efficiency of 90%?
UC San Diego researchers have created a novel solar power material for concentrating solar power (CSP). Sprayed on, the new material can convert almost 90% of the sunshine it receives into heat.
Can solar panels reach maximum efficiency?
A solar cell that is 100% efficient would violate the second law of thermodynamics. In the case of solar energy systems like photovoltaics, where the sun's heat serves as the hot side of the "heat engine" and the ambient earth temperature serves as the cold side, Carnot's theorem holds true.
You May Also Like
- How to Boost any Solar Panel Output by 75%
- How This Smart Community Is Able To Power 200 Homes With Solar And Batteries
- How Long Does it Take For Solar Panels to Payback?
- 12 Top Countries In Residential Solar Adoption
- The Innovation That Creates Wind Power From Solar Energy